Balanced Biomagnetic pair

 The  reason that there is so little research done in the field of magnetic  therapy, and especially Biomagnetic Pair therapy, lies in the fact that  patenting and trademarking techniques related to static magnets is not  possible. The law does not permit the patenting of processes that are  naturally occurring, such as magnetic fields. Because the medical and  scientific industries are unable to benefit financially from such  studies, they are less inclined to conduct extensive research into their  efficacy. We often read reports and articles refuting claims that  magnetic therapy works. Not surprisingly, this negative propaganda is  brought to us by the medical establishment and its omnipresent lobby,  which stand to lose a great deal of their market share to alternative  therapies which they find economically limiting.

There  is an important difference between traditional magnetic therapy and  Biomagnetic Pair therapy as taught by Dr. Isaac Goiz Durán. The ancient  art of magnetic therapy dates back thousands of years to Egyptian and  Chinese cultures, and perhaps others. Today, many veterinarians use  magnet therapy to quickly heal broken bones of horses and livestock  (Null, G. 1998).  The use of magnetic therapy has also been recommended  by athletics professionals to speed up the healing of sports injuries  (1998). However, magnetic therapy, as practices for centuries, is  applied for the treatment of pain relief and improved blood flow. The  theory behind this application says that the negative (north) magnetic  fields of static magnets greatly increases blood flow around injuries,  helping blood cells fight infection more effectively. For the treatment  to be even remotely effective, the correct strength is necessary. For  example, a refrigerator magnet is around 200 Gauss. Therapeutic magnets  that are commonly used for "magnetic therapy" measure anywhere from 400  to 800 Gauss. Biomagnetic Pair therapy, on the other hand, uses magnets  of two poles measuring anywhere from 3,000 Gauss to 10,000 Gauss.

In  one study, a double-blind, controlled trial of 64 people with  rheumatoid arthritis of the knee compared the effects of strong  alternating polarity magnets with the effects of a deliberately weak  unipolar magnet. Researchers used the weakened magnet as a control group  so that participants wouldn’t find it easy to break the blind by  testing the magnetism of their treatment. After 1 week of therapy, 68%  of the participants using the strong magnets (called the treatment  group) reported relief, compared to 27% in the control group. The  difference was statistically significant. Two out of four other  subjective measurements of disease severity also showed statistically  significant improvements. However, no significant improvements were seen  in objective evaluations of the condition, such as blood tests for  inflammation severity or physician’s assessment of joint tenderness,  swelling, or range of motion. This study suggests that magnet therapy  may reduce the pain of rheumatoid arthritis without altering actual  inflammation. However, the mixture of statistically significant and  insignificant results indicates that a larger trial is necessary to  factor out "statistical noise."  (Author unknown. http://www.med.nyu.edu/content?ChunkIID=33778)

Another  radical difference between the two therapies is that standard magnet  therapy does not consider the duality of biomangetic charge buildup in  the body. According to magnet therapy,  one magnet of a single pole may  be placed on any injured organ or tissue to reduce inflammation or pain  with only that goal; to reduce swelling and reduce pain. Biomagnetic  Pair, on the other hand, uses the principles of pathogenesis, and  duality. For every negatively charged point in the body that is  harboring a toxic microorganism, another corresponding opposite charge  is creating a resonance with another pathogen, hence the term Pair. One  pathogen creates or sustaining an acid environment communicates with the  microorganism creating and sustaining the alkaline environment.  However, only the pathogen on the acid side is creates symptomatology.  These imbalanced poles are neutralized with two magnets of opposite  poles, thereby destroying the pathogen that thrived in that pH (or  energetic charge).

Quoting Dr. Richard Broeringmeyer, 

"It  has been clinically established that north pole energy arrests protein  activity, draws fluids, contracts, vaso-constricts, increases  alkalinity, acts to sedate or inhibit pain, decreases activity,  increases potassium ions, decreases abnormal calcium ions and decreases  hydrogen ion concentration. The north pole can be said to be the  normalizing energy. It normalizes the alkaline state of the body but  never produces an overly alkaline condition. It oxygenates the body but  never produces oxidized free radicals. It has a normalizing effect no  matter how long the exposure."

Magnetic  therapy is limited to healing based on electromagnetic energy from  which the body may benefit. This requires, in most cases, only one side  of the magnet; north.

This  differs from Biomagnetic Pair therapy in many respects. First, the  theory behind Dr. Goiz Durán's technique is that micro organisms that  cause various symptoms in the human body are responsible for diseases  and syndromes for which science has not found a true cause. However, Dr.  Goiz discovered that the pathogens in our body are, to a great extent,  reliant upon a pH environment suitable for their needs (Dr. Goiz, 1995).  Acid environments; those that have large quantities of Hydrogen ions in  their molecular composition, are said to be hospitable for viruses and  fungi. Conversely, the alkaline areas of the body are identified by Dr.  Goiz as being those hospitable to bacteria and parasites, generally. To   those points, positive magnets are placed.

As  can be seen, the two concepts differ in the way they heal. One by  stimulating blood flow through veins, arteries and capillaries, and  electromagnetic flow through the nervous system, while the other by  altering the terrain where pathogens are disturbing equilibrium. 

References:

1998 (Null, G, Koesler, R)  Healing with Magnets.  Carroll and Graf Publishers, New York NY.

Dr. Goiz, I. (n.d.). Biomagnetísmo Médico. Retrieved from http://www.biomagnetismo.biz/bio.html

Dr. Goiz, I. (1995). The biomagnetic pair. (p. 28). Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaria de Educacion Publica.